
"If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain."
-Winston Churchill
His words have been weighing heavily on my mind lately. Who am I to disagree with Winston Churchill? But, a follow up question; if you're a liberal at twenty do you have no brain, and if you are a conservative at forty do you have no heart?
For the past few months I have been working on launching a new publication called the National Student Craft Zine (for more details follow the link).The mission of the National Student Craft Zine is to cultivate critical dialogue among students engaged in formal craft training throughout the United States (and abroad - the eventual goal is for the publication to be called International Student Craft Zine). Featuring diverse work and writing from fresh voices, the Zine will reflect ideas and trends in the field while providing students with a platform for professional development.
It has always been my implicit belief that all young metalsmiths and craftspeople are as eager and ambitious as I am. As the March 1st deadline for submissions draws near, and the response has been somewhat less overwhelming than what I thought it would be, I have been doing some real soul searching. Last week I talked at length with metals educator Daniella Kerner who offered the opinion that most students, in her experience, do not go above and beyond course or program requirements (I hope I am representing this comment accurately). If this is true then I wonder how the rising generation will take on the challenges facing our field in the years to come (among these challenges are rebranding, sustainability, a shrinking domestic craft market, rising cost of education, etc.) Also, I have heard it reported, from a marginally reliable source, that less than 10% of people who earn metals degrees stay in the field as professionals. I wonder if a business program had a 10% success rate, how long would it be before it was shut it down? Certainly Brandeis would axe it. Lastly, my feelings of despair were compounded when I finally got around to listening to the podcast of the Garth Clark lecture at the Museum of Contemporary Craft entitled How Envy Killed the Crafts Movement: An Autopsy in Two Parts. These small experiences compounded to deliver a crushing blow to my unwavering idealism. Shit.
But do not lose faith, while idealism can be suppressed it only dies when you stop believing. And after a lengthy introduction I want to delve into deconstructing the culture of apathy among America's youth and reconstructing the new culture of enthusiasm, even if it is only in my mind and on my blog.For the past few months I have been working on launching a new publication called the National Student Craft Zine (for more details follow the link).The mission of the National Student Craft Zine is to cultivate critical dialogue among students engaged in formal craft training throughout the United States (and abroad - the eventual goal is for the publication to be called International Student Craft Zine). Featuring diverse work and writing from fresh voices, the Zine will reflect ideas and trends in the field while providing students with a platform for professional development.
It has always been my implicit belief that all young metalsmiths and craftspeople are as eager and ambitious as I am. As the March 1st deadline for submissions draws near, and the response has been somewhat less overwhelming than what I thought it would be, I have been doing some real soul searching. Last week I talked at length with metals educator Daniella Kerner who offered the opinion that most students, in her experience, do not go above and beyond course or program requirements (I hope I am representing this comment accurately). If this is true then I wonder how the rising generation will take on the challenges facing our field in the years to come (among these challenges are rebranding, sustainability, a shrinking domestic craft market, rising cost of education, etc.) Also, I have heard it reported, from a marginally reliable source, that less than 10% of people who earn metals degrees stay in the field as professionals. I wonder if a business program had a 10% success rate, how long would it be before it was shut it down? Certainly Brandeis would axe it. Lastly, my feelings of despair were compounded when I finally got around to listening to the podcast of the Garth Clark lecture at the Museum of Contemporary Craft entitled How Envy Killed the Crafts Movement: An Autopsy in Two Parts. These small experiences compounded to deliver a crushing blow to my unwavering idealism. Shit.

"If you will it, it is no dream." -Theodore Herzl
A Culture of Hope?
Since the age of 18, when I was granted my voting rights, all I have ever known was the Bush administration. Under such a regime it was hard to feel, personally, that I could change anything. Despair and apathy seemed to limit the scope of my ambition for anything other than my career and personal life.
The most recent Gallup Poll shows that Barack Obama's approval rating is 67%. It has hovered between 60 and 70% since he took office just two weeks ago. If the election of Obama and the inauguration media bonanza accurately reflects how America feels right now, then I would say we are like mountaineers confidently preparing for an alpine ascent. And in seeing imminent change at the highest level of power, I cannot help but feel some reflection of that promise. I had forgotten what it was like to be proud of my government. And though I often have feelings of shame about the field in which I practice, generally speaking, it is my hope that this reflected hope will pervade every part of American - and international - life, business, and culture. I can't help but feel that anything is possible. Now is the time for change. So it a strange mix of feelings to feel so energized and inspired by President Obama and at the same time feel so empty about the academic craft youth culture. Maybe I just need to be patient. Surely there are many people who are feeling inspired now. Surely there are many people whose idealism and pragmatism has laid dormant for the past decade, and who will now take up the mantle of being craft critics, leaders, and activists. I have not lost faith in my generation yet.
Michael Moore’s 2008 film Slacker Uprising was dedicated to exploring the growing sense of urgency in societal participation and activism among America’s youth (mind you this was filmed long before Obama, during the 2004 Bush Vs. Kerry election). Even then Moore was convinced that the potential and power for change resided in America's institutions of higher learning. Even the title took account of the fact that society indeed viewed youth culture as apathetic. Now, the 2008 presidential election has certainly helped dispel the previously held perception of generation Y as apathetic slackers.
Applying the argument from my previous post (about online communities and intellectual property), in America in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s technology and information sharing spurred trend dissemination and the development of a me-centric youth culture that built its identity around consumption. The prominent application of semiotic theory in craft can attest to the power of choice (or the act of choosing) in defining both the individual and the collector. More recently, the ease of information sharing in the late 2000’s and web 2.0 applications (such as blogs, facebook , and myspace) has facilitated digital communities, and me-centric has now become we-centric. This is a point I owe partially to Tom Friedman, who uses it in describing how The World is Flat. Coming back to Moore, the fact that Slacker Uprising was released for free on the internet alludes to the power of the internet as a platform for the dissemination of ideas and community engagement, something that Moore was no doubt aware of. Activism, rather than apathy now best describes the climate of youth culture. Young people are connected and they have access to tools that empower them to make a difference.
To contrast this macro view of youth culture with the micro view of the academic craft youth culture there seems to be a disconnect (Indie craft is obviously a huge and notable exception here). Take a look at the powerful communication tool that is the Society of North American Goldsmiths online discussion board (under members area - you have to be a member). It is a ghost town. It is completely underutilized, conspicuously by students. The academic metal crafts discussion group (ACMET-L) is sponsored by metals/jewelry/cad-cam program at Tyler School of Art and goes out to approximately 300 people, though in regular posting it seems more like the same 30-50 people posting many of them not even students, shout out Phil Carrizzi! Don't forget that some of those people are required to post. There are quite a few other online forums which seem a little bit healthier (ganoksin, crafthaus, on facebook, and myspace), but I am not sure what percentage of participation can be ascribed to students. The blog scene seems to be the healthiest. But as a blogger myself, I have to say that blogs are a good one way communication tool. Despite inviting comments at the end of each post, it is rare to get more than 10 comments. In all honesty a discussion board is a better tool to have a conversation than the backwater comments page on a blog. I am forced to the conclusion that we have some catch up to do in comparison to the culture at large.
Moving Forward
I can't help but wonder what is the role of the craft/ metals academy? With a 90% failure rate (allegedly) why aren't there more students working to fix the system? If there was ever a time to be inspired, or to work for the future of metalsmithing (and craft) surely that time is now. Now is a time of hopeful poverty in craft. The commercial craft market is the smallest it has been since the advent of the studio craft movement. I agree with Garth Clark to a point that studio craft is dead, but dead only in the sense that the institutional models and infrastructure of the current craft world is not sustainable. What could be more American than rising from the proverbial ghetto to achieve fortune and fame. If you'll allow me to wryly ask, isn't that the American dream? We NEED change, we need new ideas, new models, and they will come, I am sure, mostly from new voices.
I just want to make a list here of things that could be changed or worked on in case anyone else is feeling inspired too:
-Increasing the audience for studio craft
-Expanding the definition of craft/ creating an inclusive atmosphere
-Increasing the success rate of craft school alumni
-Creating more equitable and efficient work dissemination mechanisms...making galleries work for crafters, not the other way around
-Reforming craft organizations to better serve members - both makers and non-makers
-Create dynamic forums for dialogue and exchange...that people actually use!
-Lobby for more public funding of crafts
-Establish craft as an ethical and moral alternative to industrial consumerism
-Reclaim the word craft...its not a fucking dirty word damn it
I understand only too well the difficulty in trying to accomplish any one of these goals. We are now so fiercely individualistic (perhaps necessarily so in order to be creative) that we seem to have forgotten how to work towards a common goal that is in our mutual interest. The strength of craft is the highly individual and opinionated people who make up the field. To get such people to agree and work together to achieve any sort of goal seems nearly impossible, and yet for studio craft to be vital, this is what we must do...agree and work together.
There is nothing stopping anyone from volunteering for craft organizations - save perhaps ego - and indeed many people do. But when we shun the organizations that exist to further our field, then we lose an opportunity to commune and to collaborate. For instance, I have heard many people don't join SNAG because it is not relevant to them. It is a fair point. Why waste the money? However, SNAG is a member run organization, and if its programs don't appeal to you, volunteer and start a program that does. The quote that runs on the banner to the right is slightly ironic, but the call to action has sat there for some time, "It's not what metalsmithing can do for you, its what you can do for metalsmithing." If enough people decide to dedicate themselves to making our field better then it will be. If the people running an organization are doing a bad job, then you have the opportunity to run for that office to replace them. If the board is filled with people who holds positions only because they need tenure, then you may have a better reason than them to run. *Disclaimer* I am not thinking of anyone specific here, only repeating things I have heard.
I wonder aloud, how long can a culture of apathy persist in craft if that apathy is not reflected in the general culture? So I guess this is a call to young people (old people too), to have the heart Churchill talks about, at least for now. I would like to end with another quote, this time from a life-long liberal:

"Association instead of competition, social order instead of individualist anarchy. These are the only ways to free creativity from commerce and return it to the working man."
-William Morris
-William Morris
Comments Welcome,
-Gabriel


10 comments:
hey gabriel - haven't time to read the whole post yet, but I'm just wondering - why limit it only to students - i think the way to retain graduates is to find ways for them to be involved in those critical years post-graduation - why not let emerging artists participate as well?
"life-long learners" "students" "professors" "established artists" "up-and-comings": All labels that only demand redefinition, re-appropriation to reclaim them from the lingo of commercial categorization.
The only thing students would exclusively have more to contribute would be time...
Co-Op galleries, small networks of creative and driven individuals, these are a few of the requirements for a new movement.
To breathe new life into an ancient field will require media, message and conversation.
Hopefully this is only the beginning.
Gabe,
I'm sorry to hear that you haven't been overwhelmed with interest in the zine. I was very excited about it personally.
Don't lose your zeal. It will be important to build the type of communities you speak of.
I agree that the SNAG message board could be much better utilized than it is. I believe that part of the reason it is not used much more frequently is that it is difficult to use. It does not work like other forums on the internet. For some reason the company that built the SNAG site decided to try to build a forum from scratch instead of using one of the many highly developed free forum programs available. If we could get a new forum system in place that works the way people expect a forum to work, I think we could get more people to use it.
Finally, If you guys haven't checked it out yet, SNAG and the Professional Development Seminar folks have put a great set of articles together on Etsy about getting into and working with galleries.
Dear Gabriel,
After reading this article last night I was so motivated that I stayed up until 4 am writing an essay. I really think this zine is a great idea. Come Monday, when my advanced metals class meets, I'll make an announcement to try and generate more interest and submissions.
-Mallory Weston (Uarts)
Hi Gabe,
As the moderator for the SNAG student forum, I certainly know that students can be hard to motivate. I have some theories about that, one of which is that I think students have communities/friends at their schools to talk to about art, so they don't need to seek it online. It may not be until they leave school that they start to need that outlet.
As a relatively new graduate, I do not find it hard to believe that metalsmithing has a 10% retention rate if retention is defined by people who make a professional living in metalwork. That is not easy to do. There are few teaching jobs, and starting your own business takes money, usually on top of student loans. This is unfortunate. I'm not sure what it means for the future of our field in academia. But I'm also not convinced that the only measure of success is professionalism and I do think craft will persevere; as a way of life/ideology, etc.
I'm sure you're not thinking of giving up, but I just wanted to say, Don't. We need this kind of discussion, even it if seems to fall on apathetic ears.
If you're looking for your craft community within academia, it shouldn't be too big of a shock if the atmosphere is, well, academic.
The craft community that I live, learn and work in is lively, diverse and inspiring. But then, the people I know who make their living making things have come to craft at all different stages in their lives and for all different reasons. Limiting your scope to the students and graduates of 4-year colleges's metal arts programs pretty much assures you'll get the narrowest of all possible perspectives. Just as, if you take your history only from the accounts written by white men while ignoring all other traditions of craft (indigenous, folk, domestic), well, of course you are going to see a craft community that is homogamous and elitist.
At the same time, I also question measuring the success of a program by the percentage of graduates who make a living in the same field in which they earned their undergraduate degree. That the majority of Anthropology majors do not go on to become anthropologists or that the majority of English majors don't go on to become professional critics is not really the point, is it? Presumably, these courses of study are worthwhile in themselves and perhaps impart some transferable skills. Academic programs have academic goals, not vocational ones. It's a minority of working artists and craftspeople that come from academic backgrounds.
Joanna,
While I agree with your assessment that the focus of the Zine is limited (and many friends have tried to dissuade me from making the scope so narrow) one of the goals of the zine is to give students a platform for professional development and a place to write. For most students to submit writing for publication is out of their range, and more experienced writers usually will get the nod. When writing submissions are limited to students, it is my hope that this intimate scale will encourage more students to become writers and commentators. That is the hope anyways.
I also feel that the voices of young makers that are under-represented. In fact I wouldn't even know where to look to find students writing about craft. Hopefully, that will change.
And while I lament that soon, the Zine will even exclude me also from writing. Not every publication can be everything to everyone. There should be another publication for a wider audience, but alas, I am one person, and this is the project I feel is most vital now.
-Gabriel
Hello Gabriel - the zine is a fantastic idea. I feel a submission coming on. I would like to point out that the zine web page states 'For release December 1, 2008' at the top which might be throwing people off. (I thought that meant the zine itself.)
Thanks,
Kristin
I agree with the previous comments about the folly of restricting the zine to such a narrow group: for "craft" to ultimately be successful in the twenty-first century, we need to develop our own contemporary dialogue.
That will more likely be accomplished by including all crafters, not excluding those who don't fit a restricted profile.
Coincidentally, that's what my next research project will be developing....
Gabriel,
All things that have been tried, are being tried and will be tried again. You'll see one day for yourself. For today enjoy that promise of change; tomorrow you will see with new experience, new insight and less optimism.
As for SNAG; I'd like to see them open up the forum for non-members and then consider the results.
Post a Comment